IAC Year 2010 Rule Change Ballot

Name (Required):

 

IAC Number (Required):

 

No.

Synopsis

Effected Rule

Proposed Rule Change

Rationale

10-1

Allows limited use of unlinked and opposite rolls on horizontal lines in Intermediate Power Unknowns.

Appendix 3 Intermediate

Change the NOTE FOR ALL FAMILIES on page A3-1 for Intermediate Unknown figures to: “Unlinked and opposite aileron rolls permitted only on straight, horizontal lines. Such roll combinations may not precede a figure beginning with either a 45-degree or vertical up line. Rolling elements may be added only where indicated, but are never permitted following a spin.”

This change is self-limiting because of the small number of horizontal aileron rolls permitted by Appendix 3 for Intermediate flight. There is nothing inherent in Intermediate-level aircraft capability which makes flying horizontal opposite and unlinked aileron rolls too difficult or unsafe. Energy considerations are handled by the restrictions set forth in the “Note for all Families”.

 

 

For

 

Against

 

Abstain

 

 

10-2

Adds the horizontal 1/4 and ¾ slow rolls to the allowable Family 9 figures for Intermediate Unknowns.

[NOTE: Requires passage of 10-1]

Appendix 3 Intermediate

Add the following Catalogue numbers to the allowed Intermediate Family 9.1 maneuvers:

9.1.3.1

9.1.3.3

There are currently very few options in the Intermediate Unknowns for changing the aircraft’s attitude from upright to inverted or vice versa. These two proposed horizontal roll additions are well within the capability of both Intermediate aircraft and pilots.

 

 

For

 

Against

 

Abstain

 

 

10-03

Adds two additional Family 5 Hammerheads to the legal Intermediate figures.

Appendix 3 Intermediate

Add the following Catalogue numbers and restrictions to the allowed Intermediate Family 5 maneuvers: 5.2.1 : No rolls allowed on the 45 or vertical up lines 5.4.1 : No rolls allowed on the 45 or vertical down lines

These two “45” hammerheads are well within the capability of Intermediate aircraft and pilots. With the specified restrictions on where rolls may be placed, there are no adverse effects on either safety or performance. Adding two more Intermediate-capable figures will also increase the diversity and “fun factor” of Intermediate Unknowns.

 

 

 

For

 

Against

 

Abstain

 

 

10-04

Changes the contest wind limitations from a set numeric value to a limit which can accommodate differences in contest airports and competitor experience levels.

 

 

 

Adds the wind limitation

requirement to the list of Contest

Jury duties.

4.19.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4.2

Flight will not be conducted if the combined wind speed and direction exceeds a safe limit based on the Contest Jury's judgment of flight operations when considering competitors' experience, and the contest runway's length, width, and orientation to the wind. Any contest official or competitor may ask the Contest Jury to consider stopping the contest based on wind conditions. The Contest Jury will consult with the CD, Chief Judge(s), and Starter, as appropriate, when making their final decision. Insert new paragraph (d):

 

(d) Stopping contest flying because of wind

speed or direction exceeding safety limits

based on observed flight operations.

(See 4.19.3)

The current 20 knot wind limit is a completely

arbitrary number which does not take into

consideration the orientation of that wind to the

contest runway, the width of the active runway, the

experience level of the competitors flying, or other

local conditions which may mitigate or aggravate

that limit. The current rule is also vague by not

specifying whether the 20 knot limit is surface wind

or wind at some specific altitude in the aerobatic

box. Finally, many contests lack any means of

obtaining accurate surface wind speeds, much

less box winds at altitude.

 

 

For

 

Against

 

Abstain